Automatically generated directories for individual tasty tests
April 30, 2018
This is a hack practical trick for creating directories based on test names
using the Haskell test framework tasty, as well as accessing the test
names inside your tasty tests themselves.
You can find the full code on GitHub
Last week I worked on a test suite that printed a lot of logs to stdout. This didn’t play well with tasty as the test results were interleaved with whatever was printed out on stdout. I decided to redirect the logs to files but I wanted those logs to be easily retrievable in case of a test failure. The easiest way to do so was to create a directory for each test, based on the test’s name.
The tasty framework unfortunately does not allow you to read the
TestTree
structure, thereby making it impossible to know the
current test’s name. Fortunately tasty has a flexible option
infrastructure which we can leverage to track the names used in the tree, from
the root up to the leaf — i.e. the full test name.
First we’ll create a type that contains the names encountered on a particular
path in the tree and make it a tasty option (that is, create an
IsOption
instance):
-- | The test names of the test tree newtype TastyNames = TastyNames [String] instance IsOption TastyNames where defaultValue = TastyNames [] -- The base name -- We don't care about the rest parseValue _ = Nothing optionName = Tagged "" optionHelp = Tagged ""
Note: in practice you do not want to export TastyNames
as this should only
be used internally. You don’t want your users to actually set TastyNames
on
the command line, for instance.
Then we can provide a substitute to tasty’s testGroup
that updates the TastyNames
option for the children of the node:
-- | Create a named group of test cases or other groups while keeping track of -- the specified 'TestName' testGroup :: TestName -> [TestTree] -> TestTree testGroup tn = adjustNames tn . Test.Tasty.testGroup tn -- | Records the 'TestName' in the 'TastyNames' option. adjustNames :: TestName -> TestTree -> TestTree adjustNames tn = adjustOption f where f :: TastyNames -> TastyNames f (TastyNames ns) = TastyNames (ns <> [tn])
Finally we provide helper functions that provide the test’s name as an argument to the test itself — or better, create a directory for the test:
-- | Turn an Assertion into a tasty test case, providing the 'TastyNames' -- accumulated in the test tree. testCaseWithNames :: TestName -> (TastyNames -> Assertion) -> TestTree testCaseWithNames tn act = adjustNames tn $ askOption $ \tns -> testCase tn $ act tns -- | Turn an Assertion into a tasty test case, providing a directory created -- based on the accumulated names in the test tree. testCaseWithDir :: TestName -> (FilePath -> Assertion) -> TestTree testCaseWithDir tn act = testCaseWithNames tn $ \(TastyNames tns) -> do let dir = foldr (</>) "" $ toFriendlyFilepath <$> tns createDirectoryIfMissing True dir act dir where -- bangs a string into a filepath-friendly name toFriendlyFilepath :: String -> FilePath toFriendlyFilepath = stripBoundayDash . collapseDashes . unhexToDash stripBoundayDash = reverse . stripDash . reverse . stripDash stripDash = dropWhile (== '-') unhexToDash = fmap $ toLower . (\c -> if isAlphaNum c then c else '-') collapseDashes = concatMap (\case { '-':_ -> ['-']; xs -> xs}) . group
This can be used together as follows:
main :: IO () main = defaultMain $ testGroup "foo" [ testCaseWithNames "bar" $ \(TastyNames tns) -> ["foo", "bar"] @=? tns , testCaseWithDir "bar, 3 (baz)" $ \fp -> "foo/bar-3-baz" @=? fp ]
And that’s how you can easily access tasty test names inside the test
themselves and create unique directories for your logs! How you incorporate
this in your test suite is up to you. One simple way is to use the .Extended
pattern and create new modules — Test.Tasty.Extended
and
Test.Tasty.HUnit.Extended
— which re-export most functions from the original
modules, but also the tweaked testGroup
and the helper functions
testCaseWithNames
and testCaseWithDir
. Also you may want to add another
IsOption
for setting the base directory in which the logs are created — this
one actually specifiable by the user.
Here’s the full code:
Like Haskell? Here's more on the topic:
Start a conversation or share your thoughts below!